Fish Of The Air? An Update On An Oddly Textual Californian Bee Suit - Above the LawAbove the Law

2022-09-24 00:58:40 By : Mr. SUN LIPENG

Subscribe and get breaking news, commentary, and opinions on law firms, lawyers, law schools, lawsuits, judges, and more.

Interpretation — especially legal interpretation — is hard. In response, many tout textualism as a way to interpret the legal writings of foregone years for today’s circumstances. The weird thing about reading and applying words based on their definitions is that the practical implications aren’t always as clear as one would assume at the onset. Once upon a time, Jessica Simpson caught hell for confusing canned tuna for Diogenes’ man. A good more recent example of how hard it can be to word with words comes from a Californian case trying to figure out which branch of Chondrichthyes Bombus fall under. Still buzzing with legal animus, Californian courts are leaving open the potential for bees to be protected under a fishy pretense.

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the state to consider protecting threatened bumblebees under a conservation law listing for fish.

The state’s high court refused to grant a review sought by farming groups of a May appellate court ruling that allowed the California Fish and Game Commission to consider granting endangered species protection to four types of bumblebees under a 1970 conservation law that included the term “invertebrates” under the definition of fish, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

A 1984 law that replaced the original act removed overall protection of invertebrates but specifically left in place protection of the Trinity bristle snail. The appellate ruling said the logic that allowed a land-living mollusk to fall under the law must be applied when it comes to bumblebees.

This isn’t the first time a literal reading of the text led to a literal (read: figurative) outcome. A classic bit of strange textualism is the case where a discussion on if a fish constituted a “tangible item.” The Court decided the answer was no, and then went on to deliver one of the most “legitimate” Seuss-isms known to man besides The Seven Lady Godivas. Be warned, that link could be considered NSFW. It really depends on your firms policies and if “naked characters” counts as “nudity.” Which may be harder to come to a clear answers in today’s age where bees may be fish and dictionaries are considered obscene.

Next up on the docket, maybe we can figure out the legal consequences of so many forms of life converging into crabdom? Given enough time, bumblebees may actually be fish proper.

California Fish Conservation Law Could Protect Bees [Press Democrat]

Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.

Bees, California, California Fish and Game Commission, California Supreme Court, Courts, Fish

We will never sell or share your information without your consent. See our privacy policy.

Well, Well, Well: The majority of Americans now support Court expansion. It really should never have come to this, but Sam Alito brought this upon himself.

The First Step Is Admitting You Have A Problem: Justice Breyer either doesn’t grasp the full nature of the conservative legal movement or he’s so committed to his vision of an ideal Supreme Court that he can’t level with the public. Neither option is encouraging.

Oops: Donald Trump soon to learn that this special master thing isn’t all it was cracked up to be by the crackpots representing him.

But Who Is Dating Richard Grieco?: Johnny Depp dating UK lawyer.

Teach A Man To Fish, And He’ll Always Have Honey: It may be weird that bees are legally fish, but if you go back far enough, aren’t we all fish?

© 2022 Breaking Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Registration or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Privacy Center | Do not sell my information